There has been a lot of tut-tutting recently in the media about the quality of spelling and grammar amongst graduates. Standards are dropping, it's all the fault of teachers/text-messaging/McDonald's/(insert your favourite scapegoat here). And it's not just the finer points of the English language. New graduates don't know the difference between its and it's. Can't see what is wrong with seperating facts from fiction.
And it's affecting their future careersWell, as someone with a foot in two camps: a mature student who has experienced old school methods (or should that be old skool?), and a mum of two children in secondary education, I've thought about what has changed.
In true
Dr Who stylee, let me take you into my time machine and transport you back to 1971. Notice the blackboard and chalk? The cartons of milk warming next to the radiator? See the child with the scabs on her knees. Can you see her lips moving as her latest short story masterpiece flows from her pencil onto the ruled page? Talking to herself at such an early age - what a shame, you think. But actually
'The Cat in the Hat' book on the desk beside her gives it away. Our budding author is trying to spell the words as she says them. But move closer and it seems the good Dr Seuss hasn't got the answer to everything. What's a crocadil? or an idear? - well, she is from the
West Country. Seems like she's going to have to learn the shapes of words, as well as letter sounds if she wants to become that top-flight writer. Never mind, those much loved
Enid Blyton books will help her identify those word spellings - it's just a shame about all that class/gender/racial stereotyping she'll also learn along the way.
Come back after that delicious
pre-Jamie school meal of roast mutton, cabbage and
tapioca with jam sauce and you'll see the teacher give a fleeting lesson in grammar to his flatulent class. It's the basics of course. Full stops, commas, capital letters, paragraphs and commas. But it's boring, boring, boring...and the girl would rather get back to writing about that crocadil.
Take off that scarf, ( I always did prefer Tom Baker's version of the Dr) and fast forward thirty (very) odd years. Despite perceived advances in education, both my bright, chip-off-the-ol'-block children 'get' spelling at widely-differing ages using a whole range of techniques. So some things haven't changed. And although the head-shakers and hand-wringers say that grammar isn't taught in schools anymore, part of the preparation for my son's recent
SATs involved a not insubstantial grammar revision book.
So what has gone so wrong? In my experience spelling and grammar are still being taught, but lecturers, including those at Marjons, and employers tell us standards are falling. Hmm have you got your
Kwells?
'Miss 1970s' has got her story back and all misspelled words are underlined. She has to correct them using a dictionary. Find the difference between their, there and they're. Every missed full-stop has been noticed. And if she gets them wrong in her next story she has to correct it again. It's obvious. The teacher cares about this. It's important she gets it right.
And checking is a habit that she continues into grumpy old womanhood.
When I was told that my daughter's work was being marred by poor grammar and spelling I went to see her teacher. Despite looking through her work no words were underlined. No capital letters inserted. I queried this and was told that they didn't want to hamper her creativity by the heavy-handed application of red-ink. A good sentiment I'm sure. Being a teacher must be a fine balancing act. And, of course, spelling and grammar is boring - but ultimately necessary.
So, are we sending the message loud and clear to young people that spelling and grammar matters in everyday life? Or do they feel that it is just something to learn for SATs exams and quickly forget?
Oh, I don't know. But I do have a great idear for a crocadil story.
Technorati tag:
mature student writing spelling grammar